.jpg)
12 February 2026 at 03:56 pm IST
In the most sweeping climate policy reversal of his presidency, President Donald Trump has revoked the scientific “endangerment finding” that underpins U.S. greenhouse gas regulation and eliminated federal tailpipe emissions standards for cars and trucks. Announcing the move alongside EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Trump called it the “biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history,” arguing that the 2009 Obama-era finding had harmed the auto industry and driven up consumer costs. The endangerment finding, first adopted after the Supreme Court’s 2007 ruling in Massachusetts v. EPA, determined that greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare—giving the Environmental Protection Agency authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping pollutants. Its repeal effectively strips the legal foundation for federal greenhouse gas limits on vehicles and could weaken broader climate regulations. The transportation and power sectors each account for roughly a quarter of U.S. emissions. The EPA said the previous interpretation of the Clean Air Act improperly extended to global climate impacts rather than local pollutants, and projected the rollback would save taxpayers $1.3 trillion. Under former President Joe Biden, vehicle standards aimed to cut fleetwide tailpipe emissions nearly 50% by 2032, with projected net consumer benefits of $99 billion annually through 2055. Industry reaction was mixed. Coal producers praised the decision, saying it could prevent plant retirements, while automakers stopped short of endorsing the repeal but noted compliance challenges under prior rules. Environmental groups sharply criticized the action, warning of higher pollution, increased climate risks, and mounting legal battles. Several advocacy organizations, including the Natural Resources Defense Council and Earthjustice, have pledged immediate court challenges. Legal experts say the repeal could unleash regulatory uncertainty and potentially revive climate-related public nuisance lawsuits. The decision deepens the divide over U.S. climate policy and sets the stage for a protracted legal fight that may ultimately return to the Supreme Court.
.jpg)