Banner

Bridging Different Reporting Objectives

Although ISSB and GRI are often discussed together, they were developed to address different reporting objectives. The ISSB Standards focus on sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could influence enterprise value and investor decision-making. Through IFRS S1 and IFRS S2, the ISSB has established a global baseline for sustainability and climate-related financial disclosures. GRI Standards, meanwhile, focus on an organization's impacts on the economy, environment, and society. The framework is widely used by organizations seeking to communicate sustainability performance and impacts to a broader group of stakeholders, including employees, communities, customers, regulators, and civil society organizations. Rather than competing with one another, the two frameworks are increasingly being viewed as complementary. Together, they enable organizations to address both investor-focused and impact-focused sustainability reporting requirements.

Key Areas of Ongoing Collaboration

The latest collaboration highlights several areas where greater consistency could help organizations manage sustainability disclosures more effectively. Key focus areas include:

section image

𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗻𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝘀 𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴, enabling organizations to use common methodologies and datasets across reporting frameworks.

section image

𝗡𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲-𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀, as biodiversity, ecosystem dependencies, and nature-related risks become increasingly important for reporting topics.

section image

𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿-𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀, aimed at improving comparability across industries with unique sustainability challenges and risk profiles.

section image

𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴, covering workforce-related topics such as labor practices, employee well-being, and social performance.

section image

𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀, helping organizations leverage common sustainability information across multiple reporting requirements.

These initiatives reflect a broader effort to reduce reporting inefficiencies while preserving the distinct objectives of each framework.

What the Development Signals for Companies

The collaboration provides more than just a technical alignment exercise. It also offers insight into the future direction of sustainability reporting. Climate-related disclosures remain a priority, but standard setters are increasingly expanding their focus toward biodiversity, workforce issues, and sector-specific sustainability impacts. Organizations that have concentrated primarily on carbon reporting may need to broaden their reporting capabilities as stakeholder expectations continue to evolve. The development also highlights the growing importance of sustainability data management. As reporting requirements become more detailed and interconnected, organizations are moving away from framework-specific reporting processes and toward integrated disclosure systems capable of supporting multiple reporting obligations. For companies already reporting under GRI Standards, increased interoperability may also help create a stronger foundation for future investor-focused reporting requirements, particularly as ISSB-aligned disclosures gain momentum across jurisdictions.

Challenges to Effective Implementation

While greater alignment between reporting frameworks offers clear benefits, implementation challenges remain. Several factors may continue to complicate reporting efforts:

1
𝗗𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀, as ISSB focuses on enterprise value while GRI emphasizes broader organizational impacts.
2
𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, which are becoming increasingly important as sustainability disclosures face greater scrutiny.
3
𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀, particularly for organizations that are still developing sustainability reporting systems and governance structures.
4
𝗥𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝘃𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, as countries adopt sustainability disclosure requirements at different speeds and with varying levels of alignment.

Addressing these challenges will require organizations to strengthen governance processes, improve data management capabilities, and foster closer collaboration between sustainability, finance, risk, and compliance functions.

Ready to turn climate
Ambition into Action?

Expert

Abhigyan Gupta

Advance your strategy with solutions calibrated to your market environment.

Frequently Asked Questions

IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) is a globally recognized accounting framework developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). It provides consistent rules for preparing financial statements, making it easier for investors, regulators, and businesses to compare financial performance across countries.

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was established in 2001, and the first International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) were issued shortly afterward. IFRS replaced the earlier International Accounting Standards (IAS), which had been developed by the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) since 1973. Today, IFRS continues to evolve to address emerging financial and sustainability reporting needs.

Companies can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by improving energy efficiency, switching to renewable energy, adopting cleaner technologies, optimizing transportation, reducing waste, and engaging suppliers. Measuring emissions and setting science-based targets also supports long-term decarbonization.

IFRS prohibits the Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) inventory method because it may not accurately reflect inventory values or financial performance. Instead, IFRS permits methods such as FIFO and Weighted Average Cost, which provide a more reliable representation of inventory.

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are gases such as carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O) that trap heat in the atmosphere and contribute to climate change. They are primarily generated through energy use, transportation, industrial activities, agriculture, and waste management.