EU Parliament Shocks Markets by Rejecting Sustainability Omnibus Proposal

In a surprising turn of events, the European Parliament narrowly rejected the EU's sustainability omnibus proposal in a secret ballot held on October 22, 2025. The vote concluded with 318 votes against, 309 in favor, and 34 abstentions. Originally, the proposal was set to pass without a formal vote after being approved by a committee. However, right-wing groups called for a secret ballot, which may have influenced some Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) to vote against their party's stance. This unexpected outcome has been described as a ""reality check"" by Richard Gardiner, interim head of EU policy at ShareAction, highlighting the failure of attempts to push through deregulation without genuine compromise or consultation The rejected omnibus proposal aimed to simplify sustainability reporting and due diligence obligations for European businesses, particularly under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Supporters argued that easing these requirements would reduce compliance burdens and enhance Europe's competitiveness against the US and China. However, critics, including investors, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and central bankers, expressed concerns that the proposal would weaken the EU's Green Deal policies and limit essential data for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investments and regulations. Agnès Bénassy-Quéré, deputy governor of the Banque de France, emphasized that while simplification is welcome, it should not come at the cost of ambition in the reporting framework Following the rejection, the European Parliament is set to vote on amendments to the proposal during the upcoming plenary session on November 13, 2025. This delay means that trilogue negotiations between the European Parliament, the European Commission, and EU governments cannot commence as planned. The outcome has introduced uncertainty for businesses awaiting clarity on the scope and timing of reporting and due diligence obligations. The situation reflects a deeper political divide, with some viewing the rules as necessary for responsible business conduct, while others perceive them as burdensome. The upcoming vote in November will be crucial in determining the future direction of the EU's