India Steps Up Pressure on Equity and Finance as COP30 Draft Sparks Fresh Tensions

India intensified its push for equity, climate finance, and national circumstances on November 20 as COP30 negotiations in Belém entered their final stretch. The escalation came amid growing concern over the Presidency’s draft “Global Mutirão” text, which observers say risks diluting climate justice principles central to India’s stance. At the heart of India’s intervention are provisions that leave open multiple pathways on contentious issues—especially unilateral trade measures like the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). The draft offers four options, from technical workshops to new dialogue platforms, to examine cross-border impacts. Yet India’s Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav warned during the UAE Just Transition Work Programme ministerial that such measures by developed economies are undermining trust in the UN climate process. He stressed that just transition must be “economy-wide, inclusive, people-centred, and respectful of national circumstances.” Adaptation—expected to be a defining theme at COP30—remains mired in disagreements. The draft text presents three competing options on adaptation finance, including a push to triple funding by 2030 or 2035. Yadav highlighted the scale of need at the High-Level Dialogue on Adaptation: developing nations require up to $365 billion annually by 2035, while current flows hover around $26 billion. He reiterated that adaptation finance must come as grants, not loans that deepen debt vulnerabilities. Analysts note progress remains slow. CEEW’s Vaibhav Chaturvedi said the Global Goal on Adaptation lacks political traction, while unclear public finance rules are delaying domestic planning in developing countries. Climate finance, long India’s central demand, continues to dominate its messaging. The draft text reaffirms developed countries’ obligations under Article 9 of the Paris Agreement and acknowledges the need for $1.3 trillion in annual support for developing countries by 2035. Although COP29 delivered the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) of $300 billion annually by 2035, several countries—India included—remain uneasy about how the consensus was reached. Civil society voices have been more pointed. Climate advocate Harjeet Singh warned that the draft risks weakening equity and Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR), shifting the burden of climate action onto developing nations already grappling with climate impacts and debt. He criticised the draft’s reliance on private finance and MDB lending, arguing it fails to secure legally required public finance. Singh also cautioned that proposals to triple adaptation finance lose credibility when grants are bundled with concessional loans. Negotiators now face a decisive phase: whether the final COP30 outcome reinforces climate justice priorities championed by India and other developing nations, or defaults to compromises that leave major gaps. Meanwhile, proceedings were briefly disrupted after a fire in the Blue Zone forced a full evacuation on November 20, though UNFCCC confirmed the incident was quickly contained.