Cognitud
  • About Us
  • Case Studies
  • Insights
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Cognitud
About UsCase StudiesInsightsNewsCareersContact Us

Transforming business,
responsibly!

Cognitud

Company

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Careers

Our Work

  • Solutions
  • Insights
  • Events
  • ESG Playbook
  • Procurement Playbook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • X

Subscribe to our newsletter

© 2026 Cognitud. All rights reserved.

Cookie policy
ARTICLE

BRICS Climate Agenda: Why the Global South’s Green Transition Is Becoming a Strategic Imperative

As India prepares to host the 18th BRICS Summit, climate action is taking on a broader meaning. Under India’s chairship, sustainability is being positioned not only around emissions reduction, but around a larger challenge: how can developing economies transition to a lower-carbon future while continuing to grow, secure energy and build economic resilience?

That question is increasingly important as climate risks intensify and the global transition reshapes energy systems, technology markets and supply chains.

Under India’s 2026 BRICS leadership, these issues are increasingly connected through discussions on energy transition, climate resilience, critical minerals, technology cooperation and climate finance. These priorities are closely connected. Clean-energy deployment requires reliable infrastructure; clean technologies depend on secure resource and supply chains; and large-scale transition requires access to finance and technology.

For the Global South, therefore, the climate transition is becoming as much an economic and strategic challenge as an environmental one.

Banner

Why the Global South Needs a Different Transition Path

For many developing economies, the green transition is happening while industrialization, urbanization and energy demand are still growing. Infrastructure is still being built, manufacturing capacity is expanding, and reliable energy access remains essential to development. This creates a fundamental challenge: these economies need to decarbonize without putting development on hold. Climate strategies therefore need to address several priorities at the same time:

section image

Energy access and affordability as demand continues to grow.

section image

Economic growth and industrialization alongside emissions reduction.

section image

Infrastructure that can withstand increasing climate risks.

section image

Technology and finance needed to implement the transition.

Energy is where that challenge becomes most immediate.

Building a Cleaner Energy System Without Compromising Growth

For developing economies, moving towards cleaner energy cannot come at the expense of reliability or affordability. The transition needs to support growing electricity demand while progressively lowering emissions intensity and strengthening energy security. That requires more than simply adding renewable capacity. The wider energy system needs to evolve as well. Key priorities include:

section image

Modernizing electricity grids to accommodate changing sources of generation.

section image

Expanding energy storage to support greater renewable integration.

section image

Improving energy efficiency to reduce demand and operating costs.

section image

Developing technologies such as hydrogen and carbon capture for sectors that are harder to decarbonize.

section image

Using digitalization to improve energy management and system flexibility.

This system-level approach matters because energy transition is also an economic issue. Businesses need power that is not only cleaner, but dependable and commercially viable. But the more clean technologies are deployed, the more important another question becomes: what resources are needed to build them, and how secure are those supply chains?

The Resources Behind the Green Transition

The transition to batteries, electric mobility, renewable-energy technologies and other low-carbon systems is increasing demand for critical minerals. This creates a new supply-chain challenge. When essential minerals or their processing are concentrated in a limited number of markets, disruptions can affect the cost and availability of technologies that economies increasingly depend on. For resource-rich economies, the transition also presents a chance to move further up the value chain, developing capabilities in processing, refining and manufacturing rather than relying primarily on raw-material exports. This can support domestic value creation, industrial development and greater participation in clean-technology supply chains. The strategic question is therefore changing from: “Do we have the resources?” to: “How much value can we create from those resources?” This distinction matters for businesses as well. Companies dependent on critical minerals need visibility into where their exposure sits, how concentrated their sourcing is, and whether alternative suppliers or materials can reduce vulnerability. Yet even secure resource and energy systems face another challenge: the physical impacts of climate change.

Making the Transition Resilient to Climate Risk

Climate change is already creating physical risks for economies and businesses. Extreme heat, flooding, fires and other climate-related events can damage infrastructure, disrupt production, affect agriculture and interrupt transport and logistics. This means the transition has two dimensions: reducing future climate impact and preparing for the risks already emerging. For organizations, that means looking beyond emissions and asking practical questions:

  1. 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀: Are key assets exposed to heat, flooding, or other physical risks?
  1. 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗿𝘀: Could climate events disrupt critical suppliers or production locations?
  1. 𝗟𝗼𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀: Are important transport routes vulnerable to extreme weather?
  1. 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗶𝘁𝘆: Are realistic alternatives available if a key location or supplier becomes unavailable?
  1. 𝗜𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: Are future infrastructure decisions accounting for changing climate conditions?

Climate risk is therefore becoming part of business continuity, procurement, operations and investment planning, rather than remaining a separate sustainability concern. But preparing for these risks requires more than operational planning. It also requires the capital and capabilities to adapt infrastructure, technologies and business systems.

From Climate Ambition to Practical Implementation

The transition requires significant investment in clean-energy infrastructure, resilient assets, adaptation and industrial decarbonization. For developing economies, the availability and cost of finance can be just as important as access to technology. Higher financing costs can make otherwise viable projects difficult to implement, while limited access to appropriate technologies can slow deployment. This makes finance and technology critical enablers of implementation. Investment is needed across renewable-energy infrastructure, grid modernization, energy storage, climate-resilient infrastructure, industrial decarbonization and adaptation. At the same time, developing economies need access to technologies suited to their own energy systems, industrial capabilities and development priorities, rather than a single model applied uniformly across markets. The challenge, therefore, is not simply making climate commitments. It is connecting finance, technology, infrastructure and local capabilities well enough to turn those commitments into measurable progress. And that is where the transition becomes a business issue.

What the Transition Means for Business

For companies operating across the Global South, shifts in energy systems, resource availability, climate exposure and financing are increasingly influencing strategic and operational decisions. The implications extend across:

Energy strategy
Changes in power systems, renewable integration, and efficiency can affect operating costs and long-term investment decisions.
Procurement
Critical-mineral dependencies can create new sourcing risks for businesses connected to batteries, electronics, mobility, and clean technologies.
Supply-chain resilience
Climate-related disruptions can affect suppliers, facilities, and logistics networks.
Investment decisions
Emerging technologies require businesses to assess both their potential benefits and implementation risks.
Capital allocation
New infrastructure and technology choices need to account for energy costs, climate exposure, transition requirements, and access to finance.

For CEOs and business leaders, these shifts have implications far beyond sustainability reporting. Changes in energy costs, resource availability, technology and access to capital can influence competitiveness, investment decisions and the ability to operate effectively across changing markets. Sustainability therefore needs to be considered alongside the commercial decisions that shape growth, investment and operational performance, rather than treated solely as a compliance function.

How Cognitud Can Help

As the green transition reshapes energy systems, resource markets, supply chains and climate-risk priorities, businesses need to connect sustainability considerations with the decisions that influence performance. Cognitud brings together expertise across energy transition, climate action, sustainable procurement and supply-chain strategy to help organizations navigate these interconnected challenges. This includes translating transition priorities into practical roadmaps, assessing climate and supply-chain exposure, identifying decarbonization opportunities and strengthening operational preparedness. By connecting these considerations with business strategy, Cognitud helps organizations make better-informed decisions as energy, resource, technology and capital markets continue to evolve.

Banner