For many developing economies, the green transition is happening while industrialization, urbanization and energy demand are still growing. Infrastructure is still being built, manufacturing capacity is expanding, and reliable energy access remains essential to development. This creates a fundamental challenge: these economies need to decarbonize without putting development on hold. Climate strategies therefore need to address several priorities at the same time:
Energy access and affordability as demand continues to grow.
Economic growth and industrialization alongside emissions reduction.
Infrastructure that can withstand increasing climate risks.
Technology and finance needed to implement the transition.
Energy is where that challenge becomes most immediate.
For developing economies, moving towards cleaner energy cannot come at the expense of reliability or affordability. The transition needs to support growing electricity demand while progressively lowering emissions intensity and strengthening energy security. That requires more than simply adding renewable capacity. The wider energy system needs to evolve as well. Key priorities include:
Modernizing electricity grids to accommodate changing sources of generation.
Expanding energy storage to support greater renewable integration.
Improving energy efficiency to reduce demand and operating costs.
Developing technologies such as hydrogen and carbon capture for sectors that are harder to decarbonize.
Using digitalization to improve energy management and system flexibility.
This system-level approach matters because energy transition is also an economic issue. Businesses need power that is not only cleaner, but dependable and commercially viable. But the more clean technologies are deployed, the more important another question becomes: what resources are needed to build them, and how secure are those supply chains?
The transition to batteries, electric mobility, renewable-energy technologies and other low-carbon systems is increasing demand for critical minerals. This creates a new supply-chain challenge. When essential minerals or their processing are concentrated in a limited number of markets, disruptions can affect the cost and availability of technologies that economies increasingly depend on. For resource-rich economies, the transition also presents a chance to move further up the value chain, developing capabilities in processing, refining and manufacturing rather than relying primarily on raw-material exports. This can support domestic value creation, industrial development and greater participation in clean-technology supply chains. The strategic question is therefore changing from: “Do we have the resources?” to: “How much value can we create from those resources?” This distinction matters for businesses as well. Companies dependent on critical minerals need visibility into where their exposure sits, how concentrated their sourcing is, and whether alternative suppliers or materials can reduce vulnerability. Yet even secure resource and energy systems face another challenge: the physical impacts of climate change.
Climate change is already creating physical risks for economies and businesses. Extreme heat, flooding, fires and other climate-related events can damage infrastructure, disrupt production, affect agriculture and interrupt transport and logistics. This means the transition has two dimensions: reducing future climate impact and preparing for the risks already emerging. For organizations, that means looking beyond emissions and asking practical questions:
Climate risk is therefore becoming part of business continuity, procurement, operations and investment planning, rather than remaining a separate sustainability concern. But preparing for these risks requires more than operational planning. It also requires the capital and capabilities to adapt infrastructure, technologies and business systems.
The transition requires significant investment in clean-energy infrastructure, resilient assets, adaptation and industrial decarbonization. For developing economies, the availability and cost of finance can be just as important as access to technology. Higher financing costs can make otherwise viable projects difficult to implement, while limited access to appropriate technologies can slow deployment. This makes finance and technology critical enablers of implementation. Investment is needed across renewable-energy infrastructure, grid modernization, energy storage, climate-resilient infrastructure, industrial decarbonization and adaptation. At the same time, developing economies need access to technologies suited to their own energy systems, industrial capabilities and development priorities, rather than a single model applied uniformly across markets. The challenge, therefore, is not simply making climate commitments. It is connecting finance, technology, infrastructure and local capabilities well enough to turn those commitments into measurable progress. And that is where the transition becomes a business issue.
For companies operating across the Global South, shifts in energy systems, resource availability, climate exposure and financing are increasingly influencing strategic and operational decisions. The implications extend across:
For CEOs and business leaders, these shifts have implications far beyond sustainability reporting. Changes in energy costs, resource availability, technology and access to capital can influence competitiveness, investment decisions and the ability to operate effectively across changing markets. Sustainability therefore needs to be considered alongside the commercial decisions that shape growth, investment and operational performance, rather than treated solely as a compliance function.